Tension
between the Syrian government and a coalition rebel forces has drawn much
international attention these past few weeks. While this is an ongoing
conflict of around two years now, recent developments on the issue have created
a great amount of political turmoil worldwide.
As
I said before, this conflict is nothing new. In early 2011 Syrian
citizens mimicked the peaceful protests that had taken place in Egypt and
Tunisia in order to show their growing disdain with the government and
President Assad’s leadership. The Syrian government responded to these
protests violently. When the demonstrations initially began security
forces were sent to quietly kill those involved in the hopes of silencing
activists without drawing too much international attention to the issue.
Security forces also used torture and rape as means to punish activists.
As protests continued the government increased the intensity of their
responses, which soon escalated to open-fire on protesters.
The
consistent violence displayed by the government led rebel groups to counter
with violent actions as well, leading to the outbreak of a civil war. The
opposition forces began organizing themselves, and in July of 2011 opposition
activists met in Istanbul to form a unified union, known as the Free Syrian
Army (FSA). Outbreaks of violence continue to take place within the
nation’s borders and many political powers worldwide do not think peace will
come any time soon.
As
I stated earlier, recent developments on this conflict have created much
political turmoil worldwide within the past few weeks. It is speculated
that the Syrian government carried out an attack on civilians using chemical
weapons, which many international leaders believe goes against the agreement
that chemical weapons are immoral and should not be used against civilians.
The use of these weapons has raised many questions regarding
whether or not other international powers should become involved with the
issue. In the past week president Obama has requested congressional
approval to perform a tactical strike on Syria in order to prevent any further
use of chemical weaponry. The possibility of US intervention has caused a
lot of debate with the United States' own borders, and has increased tensions
between the United States and other international powers such as Russia and
China.
Authors:
Angela Markwith
David Galdamez
Wes Campagna
Hao Le
Luke Manuel
Jasmin Rezaie-Tirabadi
Kelsey Turner
Work Cited
Fisher, M. (2013, August
29). 9 Questions About Syria You Were Too Embarrassed to Ask. The
Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2013/08/29/9-questions-about-syria-you-were-too-embarrassed-to-ask/
(2013, September 4).
Syria Profile. BBC News. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-14703856
Acosta, J. (2013, August
31). Obama’s last minute decision to seek congressional approval for Syria
strike. CNN U.S. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2013/08/31/us/obama-last-minute-decision/index.html?iref=allsearch
You mention Turkey, Russia, China, and the U.S. in this post; do you believe international pressure will keep Syria from war or be the spark itself?
ReplyDelete