As of this morning, the United
Nations has scheduled to meet to cast votes on a draft resolution on that would
require Syria to destroy all chemical weapons.
The proposed U.N. resolution would "require the destruction of a
category of weapons that the Syrian government has used ruthlessly and
repeatedly against its own people. And this resolution will make clear that
there are going to be consequences for noncompliance," according to
Samantha Power, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations. Two aims of this council was first, to
increase the pressure on Syria in allowing access to members of the Commission
of Inquiring monitoring the violations of human rights to make sure that those
responsible for violating those rights are brought to justice. Another aim of the council to support
international agencies that are seeking to deliver aid to more than six million
people in the face of bureaucratic obstacles and restrictions on visas as well
as the risk of violence from all sides.
President Obama, ignoring the
protests by citizens and military, came to the resolution that Syria’s use of
chemical weapons was intolerable and could not go unnoticed. His statement was supported by Russia, in
which Syria agreed to eliminate its chemical weapons under the agreement
negotiated by Russian minister Mr. Lavrov and Secretary of State, Mr. Kerry.
As of this afternoon and after much
time spent delegating the U.N. Security Council votes to adopt a resolution that
requires Syria to eliminate its chemical weapons.
Walsh, Nick
Paton, Dana Ford, Andrew Carey, and Jim Sciutto. "Security Council Could
Vote Tonight on Syria Chemical Weapons Resolution." CNN. Cable News
Network, 01 Jan. 1970. Web. 27 Sept. 2013.
Cumming-Brice,
Nick. "U.N. Rights Panel Increases Pressure on Syria." New York
Times. N.p., 27 Sept. 2013. Web. 27 Sept. 2013.
No comments:
Post a Comment