There was
another disturbing announcement coming out of Japan this week, adding even more
bad news to the already serious environmental disaster that began in March of
2011, when a 9.0 earthquake and massive tsunami destroyed the Tokyo Electric
Power Company (TEPCO) Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant. Japan is no longer in a position to keep the
promises made in 2010 by the previous government to reduce its greenhouse gas
emissions, which escalates global warming. The harmful effects to our environment caused
by an increase in greenhouse gas emissions are producing an alarming crisis of
climate change. Many environmental
scientists agree that this “makes extreme weather events, possibly including
the devastating typhoon that hit the Philippines last week, more severe and
more frequent” (Tabuchi, 2013).
This
announcement coincides with international talks taking place in Warsaw this
week being led by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
(UNFCCC) in an attempt to reach a global agreement on reducing the
ever-increasing threat of a changing climate.
Japan is one of the top five polluters in the world, and their goal had
been to lower emissions a full 25 percent from what it was in 1990, and now
they estimate the rate will probably increase to about three percent by 2020. However, in just one year without nuclear
power, from March 2012 through March 2013, Japan’s rate of carbon dioxide emissions
has been measured at fourteen percent higher
than it was in 1990. All of Japan’s fifty
nuclear reactors have been shutdown since the earthquake and tsunami damaged
four out of the six reactors at Fukushima, resulting in a massive nuclear
meltdown and explosions that released radioactive material into the
atmosphere.
Unfortunately,
because Japan had been relying on nuclear power to provide thirty percent of
its total power needs, and because they had not developed other renewable
energy sources such as wind or solar power, they have no other options besides
making this grim announcement, and to go on polluting our environment. In order to make up for the energy deficit
created by taking all of its nuclear power plants offline, Japan has been
forced to rely on other sources of energy.
They have been importing more fossil fuels and restarting old power
stations that run on either coal or gas.
Now, Japan is releasing more carbon dioxide into the environment,
increasing the possibility of even more catastrophic events like Typhoon Haiyan that killed
thousands of people in the Philippines and left possibly millions without shelter, food, or safe water.
TEPCO cut corners when it built the Fukushima nuclear
power plant, and is another example of an irresponsible and greedy corporation
that was left unregulated and unwatched, allowing it to do whatever was most
profitable at the time. Despite the fact
that it sits right on the coast of Japan, in a part of the world prone to
earthquakes, safety measures were severely deficient, including a seawall
designed to hold back waves up to only about nineteen feet that had no chance
of keeping the tsunami, which rose to an estimated 46 feet, from crashing down over
the entire site. Now, we
are all paying the price for what TEPCO failed to do when it built the Fukushima nuclear power plant.
References
Tabuchi,
H. and Jolly, D. (2013, November 15). Japan backs off from emissions targets, citing
Fukushima disaster. The New York Times. Retrieved
November 15, 2013 from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/16/world/asia/japan-backs-off-from-emissions-targets.html
Fackler,
M. (2011, June 1). Report finds Japan underestimated tsunami
danger. The New York Times. Retrieved September 2, 2013 from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/02/world/asia/02japan.html
I have noticed there have been more environmental disasters since the Tsunami that hit Japan, but I do not believe it is all because of the nuclear waste that has caused global warming to accelerate. I could believe that the Typhoon that hit the Philippines really hard a few weeks ago, could have been the outcome of global warming with the contribution of pollution and nuclear waste from Japan. I agree that if they knew that they had built nuclear plants on a earthquake fault line, they should have had better precautions and thought more about how to cope with dangerous "what ifs" situations.
ReplyDelete